Child rights action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Why New Zealand is a terrible example to follow

0 comments

"New Zealand was also highlighted as a model system by some experts, who said that given its size and geographic position, it might be a more suitable model for smaller nations."Rethinking Public Service Broadcasting's Place in International Media Development" by the Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA  As a journalist since 1982 in the Pacific Islands including New Zealand, my view would be that advice from these experts should be evaluated much more critically. Under various administrations, from both major parties since 1984, public broacasters have suffered endless restructuring, corporatisation, funding cutbacks and freezes.

Equally damaging, the charter governing public service aspects of TVNZ channels was dumped under the current government, leaving the station an entirely ratings and profit driven organisation. Dividends are regularly paid to government, with an estimated half billion dollars paid over a ten year period - a not insignificant amount for a nation of just four million.

Unlike next door in Australia, where investigative current affairs programmes such as Four Corners are respected, even feared, New Zealand journalism has been left shattered, demoralised and basically dysfunctional.

As an example of how dysfunctional, there were no professional journalism conferences in New Zealand between 1987 and 2007, either by unions, companies, public bodies or journalists themselves. The 2007 conference, held at Parliament, turned into a one off, with promises from the host union of a journalism review and follow up conference failing to materialise.

Another example is the almost complete absence of any professional journalism bodies outside of limited trade focused groups. The country's largest grouping, the so-called Kiwi Journalists Association, exists in name only as a social network on Facebook. Members have been banned for criticising ethical standards.

One final example of why New Zealand is a terrible example to quote for smaller countries: state broadcasters across the Pacific are either absent, crushed or still damaged from privatisation efforts promoted by New Zealand in the island region.

Hostility towards journalism and public broadcasting is entrenched in New Zealand, and should instead serve as a case study of how not to handle public service responsibilities, and aspirations. 

Understandably, New Zealand does not figure large on the world stage and is easy to overlook when preparing a global study such as this one, which is otherwise excellent in its accessibility.

However, news media lessons to be learnt from the New Zealand example have wide application in an era of globalisation, free markets and deregulation, which New Zealand also champions.