Child rights action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

A randomized trial of a health care program for first-time adolescent mothers and their infants

0 comments

O'Sullivan, A.L., & Jacobsen, B.S. (1992). A randomized trial of a health care program for first-time adolescent mothers and their infants. Nursing Research, 41(4), 210-215

OVERVIEW

The goals of this untitled program for disadvantaged adolescent mothers are to prevent second pregnancies, maintain attendance at a clinic so that infants have up to date immunizations, have adolescent mothers resume schooling, and reduce the use of emergency room for routine infant care. The program randomly assigned adolescent mothers 17 years of age or younger to an intervention or control group. The program provides routine care for mothers as well as additional special care. Mothers in the experimental group were less likely to have a repeat pregnancy, and their infants were more likely to be fully immunized. There was no impact on return to school. Clinic drop out was high, but was lower for those in the treatment than in the control group. Use of emergency rooms was somewhat lower; but the difference was not significant.

DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM

Target population: the program targets first-time adolescent mothers who had recently given birth.

This special health care program has four goals. The program tried to prevent second pregnancies, maintain attendance at clinics so infants could receive up to date immunizations, have adolescent mothers return to school, and reduce emergency room use for routine infant care. The program provides regular routine care as well as additional special care.

The routine care consists of appointments for appropriate immunizations and referrals to social services. Special care consists of on site social services. These services include counseling, referrals to a birth control clinic, and parenting instruction by a social worker. In addition, mothers were asked their plans for returning to school and were given instructions on how to manage parenting issues. Finally, participants receiving special care were given follow up calls and letters if they missed their appointments.

EVALUATION(S) OF PROGRAM

Evaluated population: 243 first-time adolescent mothers and their infants were randomly assigned to either a program or control group.

Approach: All mothers in the sample were African American, unwed, and Medicaid recipients who had delivered a healthy baby at a large urban hospital in the eastern US. In total, 120 mothers were assigned to the experimental group and 123 mothers were assigned to the control group. Control participants were provided with routine care and experimental participants were provided with routine care and additional services by a social worker, pediatrician, and a nurse practitioner. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline.

Data were collected through interviews with mothers, school records, and hospital records during the mother's postpartum stay at the hospital. Data were also collected on demographics, emergency room and clinic use, repeat pregnancy, immunizations, return to school, and physician care.

Results: Results of the study indicated that participants in the program attended significantly more well-baby visits. While both groups had high dropout rates, members of the experimental group were less likely to drop out of the clinic. Further, experimental participants had significantly fewer second pregnancies than control participants. However, based on non-experimental analyses when breaking up the groups, drop-outs carried the weight of this difference. In other words, among drop-outs, those in the program group were less likely than those in the control group to have a second pregnancy. It appears that even minimal exposure to the program decreases the likelihood of repeat pregnancies. With regard to immunization, significantly more infants in the program group were fully immunized than those in the control group. The researchers did not find a significant difference for mothers returning to school and found a non-significant difference for the use of emergency room care for infant care.